CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO vs FULLY COOKED PORK LOIN BABY BACK RIBS IN BBQ SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO: 5
vs
FULLY COOKED PORK LOIN BABY BACK RIBS IN BBQ SAUCE: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO | FULLY COOKED PORK LOIN BABY BACK RIBS IN BBQ SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 121 cal | 236 cal | |
| Protein | 17.1 g | 15 g | |
| Carbs | 2.9 g | 15.7 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 12.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO | FULLY COOKED PORK LOIN BABY BACK RIBS IN BBQ SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO | FULLY COOKED PORK LOIN BABY BACK RIBS IN BBQ SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 389 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 607 MG |