CHICKEN FRANKS vs SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 3
vs
SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 cal | 310 cal | |
| Protein | 13.4 g | 20.7 g | |
| Carbs | 3.0 g | 1.7 g | |
| Fat | 19.4 g | 24.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 30 MG | 34 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 821 MG | 914 MG |