CHICKEN FRANKS vs PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 4
vs
PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 238 cal | 280 cal | |
| Protein | 11.9 g | 16 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 22.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,071 MG | 893 MG |