CHICKEN FRANKS vs HARD SMOKED PORK & BEEF SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARD SMOKED PORK & BEEF SAUSAGE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 3
vs
HARD SMOKED PORK & BEEF SAUSAGE: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | HARD SMOKED PORK & BEEF SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 311 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17.8 g | |
| Carbs | 8.9 g | 2.2 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 25.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | HARD SMOKED PORK & BEEF SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | HARD SMOKED PORK & BEEF SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,107 MG | 878 MG |