CHICKEN FLORENTINE ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN vs SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FLORENTINE ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN: 4
vs
SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FLORENTINE ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN | SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 128 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 11.5 g | 11.4 g | |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 6.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FLORENTINE ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN | SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FLORENTINE ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN | SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 88 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 23 MG | 150 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 345 MG | 336 MG |