CHICKEN BURGERS vs BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN BURGERS: 3
vs
BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN BURGERS | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 235 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 1.4 g | |
| Fat | 17.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN BURGERS | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN BURGERS | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 835 MG | 343 MG |