CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs PINELAND FARMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 5
vs
PINELAND FARMS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS | PINELAND FARMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 246 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 14.0 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 21.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS | PINELAND FARMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS | PINELAND FARMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,071 MG | 684 MG |