CHICKEN BOLOGNA vs SLOW ROASTED BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW ROASTED BEEF wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN BOLOGNA: 1
vs
SLOW ROASTED BEEF: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | SLOW ROASTED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 219 cal | 113 cal | |
| Protein | 15.6 g | 18.9 g | |
| Carbs | 9.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 15.6 g | 2.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | SLOW ROASTED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | SLOW ROASTED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,156 MG | 755 MG |