CHICKEN BACON RANCH LOADED ROLLS CHICKEN vs BOULDER TAMALES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BOULDER TAMALES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN BACON RANCH LOADED ROLLS CHICKEN: 4
vs
BOULDER TAMALES: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN BACON RANCH LOADED ROLLS CHICKEN | BOULDER TAMALES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 141 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 3.0 g | |
| Carbs | 33.3 g | 19.2 g | |
| Fat | 17.5 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN BACON RANCH LOADED ROLLS CHICKEN | BOULDER TAMALES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN BACON RANCH LOADED ROLLS CHICKEN | BOULDER TAMALES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 89 MG | 40 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 86 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 789 MG | 288 MG |