CHICKEN AND PORK RED HOTS SAUSAGE vs HOFMANN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HOFMANN wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN AND PORK RED HOTS SAUSAGE: 2
vs
HOFMANN: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN AND PORK RED HOTS SAUSAGE | HOFMANN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 8.9 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 33.9 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN AND PORK RED HOTS SAUSAGE | HOFMANN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN AND PORK RED HOTS SAUSAGE | HOFMANN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,343 MG | 875 MG |