CHICAGO FLATS vs ORIGINAL BAKED SNACK CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CHICAGO FLATS: 4
vs
ORIGINAL BAKED SNACK CRACKERS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICAGO FLATS | ORIGINAL BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 444 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 72.2 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICAGO FLATS | ORIGINAL BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICAGO FLATS | ORIGINAL BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4 MG | 3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 100 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 472 MG | 750 MG |