CHICAGO FLATS vs BAKED SNACK CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICAGO FLATS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICAGO FLATS: 4
vs
BAKED SNACK CRACKERS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICAGO FLATS | BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 444 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 72.2 g | 60.7 g | |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICAGO FLATS | BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICAGO FLATS | BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 472 MG | 857 MG |