CHIC & SWEET COOKIE vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHIC & SWEET COOKIE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHIC & SWEET COOKIE: 4
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIC & SWEET COOKIE | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 406 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 6.3 g | |
| Carbs | 63.3 g | 59.4 g | |
| Fat | 15 g | 15.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIC & SWEET COOKIE | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIC & SWEET COOKIE | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 167 MG | 328 MG |