CHERRY vs MARSHMALLOW DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHERRY wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHERRY: 4
vs
MARSHMALLOW DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHERRY | MARSHMALLOW DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 76.7 g | 76.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHERRY | MARSHMALLOW DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 36 MG |