CHEDDAR FLAVOR ANCIENT GRAINS PUFFS vs CHILE LIMON FLAVORED ONION FLAVORED RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHILE LIMON FLAVORED ONION FLAVORED RINGS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHEDDAR FLAVOR ANCIENT GRAINS PUFFS: 0
vs
CHILE LIMON FLAVORED ONION FLAVORED RINGS: 5
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHEDDAR FLAVOR ANCIENT GRAINS PUFFS | CHILE LIMON FLAVORED ONION FLAVORED RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 21.4 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHEDDAR FLAVOR ANCIENT GRAINS PUFFS | CHILE LIMON FLAVORED ONION FLAVORED RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHEDDAR FLAVOR ANCIENT GRAINS PUFFS | CHILE LIMON FLAVORED ONION FLAVORED RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 821 MG | 929 MG |