CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING: 0
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 6
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 395 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 41.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 860 MG |