CHARMS vs ORIGINAL MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT FLAVOUR MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT FLAVOUR MARSHMALLOW wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHARMS: 2
vs
ORIGINAL MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT FLAVOUR MARSHMALLOW: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHARMS | ORIGINAL MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT FLAVOUR MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 438 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.1 g | |
| Carbs | 87.5 g | 59.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 21.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHARMS | ORIGINAL MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT FLAVOUR MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHARMS | ORIGINAL MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT FLAVOUR MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 47 MG |