CHARMS vs SOUR MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOUR MARSHMALLOW wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHARMS: 1
vs
SOUR MARSHMALLOW: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHARMS | SOUR MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.2 g | |
| Carbs | 87.5 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHARMS | SOUR MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHARMS | SOUR MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 938 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |