CERAMIC CRUET & AGED BALSAMIC VINEGAR vs BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CERAMIC CRUET & AGED BALSAMIC VINEGAR wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CERAMIC CRUET & AGED BALSAMIC VINEGAR: 4
vs
BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CERAMIC CRUET & AGED BALSAMIC VINEGAR | BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 93 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 20 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CERAMIC CRUET & AGED BALSAMIC VINEGAR | BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CERAMIC CRUET & AGED BALSAMIC VINEGAR | BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 27 MG | 0 MG |