CELESTIAL vs HARRIS TEETER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARRIS TEETER wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
CELESTIAL: 1
vs
HARRIS TEETER: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CELESTIAL | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 cal | 29 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 12.5 g | 7.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CELESTIAL | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CELESTIAL | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 17 MG | 0 MG |