CANDY JEWELRY vs COATED TAMARIND CANDY WATERMELON FLAVOR AND FILLED WITH TAMARIND PULP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COATED TAMARIND CANDY WATERMELON FLAVOR AND FILLED WITH TAMARIND PULP wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CANDY JEWELRY: 0
vs
COATED TAMARIND CANDY WATERMELON FLAVOR AND FILLED WITH TAMARIND PULP: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANDY JEWELRY | COATED TAMARIND CANDY WATERMELON FLAVOR AND FILLED WITH TAMARIND PULP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 383 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 95 g | 90 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANDY JEWELRY | COATED TAMARIND CANDY WATERMELON FLAVOR AND FILLED WITH TAMARIND PULP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANDY JEWELRY | COATED TAMARIND CANDY WATERMELON FLAVOR AND FILLED WITH TAMARIND PULP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 600 MG |