CANDY CANE ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANDY CANE ALMONDS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
CANDY CANE ALMONDS: 7
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANDY CANE ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 73.3 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANDY CANE ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANDY CANE ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 33 MG | 0 MG |