CALIFORNIA ALMONDS vs MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CALIFORNIA ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CALIFORNIA ALMONDS: 5
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 586 cal | 548 cal | |
| Protein | 20.7 g | 11.9 g | |
| Carbs | 20.7 g | 47.6 g | |
| Fat | 51.7 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 10.3 g | 4.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 276 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.7 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 48 MG |