CAJUN SEASONING BLEND vs MCCORMICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAJUN SEASONING BLEND wins in 2 out of 7 nutrient categories
CAJUN SEASONING BLEND: 2
vs
MCCORMICK: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAJUN SEASONING BLEND | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAJUN SEASONING BLEND | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 8,125 MG | 8,333 MG |