CAESAR DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 1 out of 10 nutrient categories
CAESAR DRESSING: 1
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 0
(9 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAESAR DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 400 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 40 g | 40 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CAESAR DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAESAR DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,067 MG | 1,067 MG | Tie |