CAESAR DRESSING vs BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CAESAR DRESSING: 3
vs
BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAESAR DRESSING | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 367 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 36.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CAESAR DRESSING | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAESAR DRESSING | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 533 MG | 967 MG |