BUTTERY GARLIC FLAVORED FULLY COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN vs BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUTTERY GARLIC FLAVORED FULLY COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN: 3
vs
BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUTTERY GARLIC FLAVORED FULLY COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 238 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 1.4 g | |
| Fat | 15.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUTTERY GARLIC FLAVORED FULLY COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUTTERY GARLIC FLAVORED FULLY COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 202 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,274 MG | 343 MG |