BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING vs ORGANIC LOW FAT ITALIANO DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC LOW FAT ITALIANO DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING: 0
vs
ORGANIC LOW FAT ITALIANO DRESSING: 5
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | ORGANIC LOW FAT ITALIANO DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | ORGANIC LOW FAT ITALIANO DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | ORGANIC LOW FAT ITALIANO DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 900 MG |