BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS vs CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS: 2
vs
CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS | CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 57.1 g | Tie |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS | CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 21.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS | CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 1,321 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 339 MG | 643 MG |