BUN LENGTH ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS vs HATFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HATFIELD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUN LENGTH ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
HATFIELD: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN LENGTH ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 340 cal | 220 cal | |
| Protein | 12 g | 14.6 g | |
| Carbs | 4 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 14.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN LENGTH ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 12 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN LENGTH ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 740 MG | 829 MG |