BULGUR QUINOA WITH VEDETABLES vs RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BULGUR QUINOA WITH VEDETABLES: 4
vs
RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BULGUR QUINOA WITH VEDETABLES | RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 cal | 99 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 6.6 g | |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 4.2 g | |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BULGUR QUINOA WITH VEDETABLES | RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 8.6 MG | 28.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BULGUR QUINOA WITH VEDETABLES | RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 19 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 314 MG | 291 MG |