BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB vs WILD CAUGHT KING CRAB SECTIONS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT KING CRAB SECTIONS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB: 4
vs
WILD CAUGHT KING CRAB SECTIONS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | WILD CAUGHT KING CRAB SECTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 220 cal | 96 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 18.8 g | |
| Carbs | 23.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | WILD CAUGHT KING CRAB SECTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | WILD CAUGHT KING CRAB SECTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 59 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 72 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1 MG | 1,072 MG |