BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB vs BABY BACK RIBS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB: 7
vs
BABY BACK RIBS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | BABY BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 220 cal | 236 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 23.1 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 16.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | BABY BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | BABY BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 72 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1 MG | 564 MG |