BUDDIG vs VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
BUDDIG: 3
vs
VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUDDIG | VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 180 cal | 128 cal | |
| Protein | 16 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 6 g | 6.4 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 3.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUDDIG | VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUDDIG | VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 840 MG | 681 MG |