BUCKLEY FARMS vs COOKED THIN SLICED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED THIN SLICED HAM wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUCKLEY FARMS: 2
vs
COOKED THIN SLICED HAM: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUCKLEY FARMS | COOKED THIN SLICED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 89 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUCKLEY FARMS | COOKED THIN SLICED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUCKLEY FARMS | COOKED THIN SLICED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 938 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 768 MG | 696 MG |