BUCK WILD vs BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUCK WILD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUCK WILD: 5
vs
BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUCK WILD | BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 50 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUCK WILD | BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUCK WILD | BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 339 MG |