BROOKSIDE vs DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
BROOKSIDE: 4
vs
DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BROOKSIDE | DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 529 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 51.0 g | 56.7 g | |
| Fat | 37.3 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 5.9 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BROOKSIDE | DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BROOKSIDE | DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 39 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.3 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 233 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 78 MG | 0 MG |