BRISTOL vs OLD WISCONSIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
BRISTOL: 2
vs
OLD WISCONSIN: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BRISTOL | OLD WISCONSIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 196 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 14.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BRISTOL | OLD WISCONSIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BRISTOL | OLD WISCONSIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 9.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 929 MG | 929 MG | Tie |