BRISLING SARDINES IN MUSTARD vs HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BRISLING SARDINES IN MUSTARD: 4
vs
HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BRISLING SARDINES IN MUSTARD | HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 198 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 13.2 g | 21.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fat | 16.0 g | 29.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BRISLING SARDINES IN MUSTARD | HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BRISLING SARDINES IN MUSTARD | HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 142 MG | 455 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 132 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 764 MG | 1,018 MG |