BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS vs PILGRIM'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS: 5
vs
PILGRIM'S: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS | PILGRIM'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 98 cal | |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS | PILGRIM'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS | PILGRIM'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 283 MG | 116 MG |