BONELESS vs BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BONELESS: 4
vs
BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS | BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 183 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 17.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.4 g | |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 12.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS | BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS | BACON WRAPPED CHICKEN TENDER FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 317 MG |