BONELESS PORK CHOP BACON WRAPPED vs FILET OF BEEF TENDERLOIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FILET OF BEEF TENDERLOIN wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BONELESS PORK CHOP BACON WRAPPED: 3
vs
FILET OF BEEF TENDERLOIN: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS PORK CHOP BACON WRAPPED | FILET OF BEEF TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 193 cal | 155 cal | |
| Protein | 29.3 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fat | 9.3 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS PORK CHOP BACON WRAPPED | FILET OF BEEF TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS PORK CHOP BACON WRAPPED | FILET OF BEEF TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 407 MG | 399 MG |