BONELESS FRIED CHICKEN AND HAM TENDER WHITE CHICKEN PATTY AND HAM vs MEAT LASAGNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEAT LASAGNA wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BONELESS FRIED CHICKEN AND HAM TENDER WHITE CHICKEN PATTY AND HAM: 4
vs
MEAT LASAGNA: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS FRIED CHICKEN AND HAM TENDER WHITE CHICKEN PATTY AND HAM | MEAT LASAGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 cal | 122 cal | |
| Protein | 6.0 g | 6.1 g | |
| Carbs | 16.1 g | 10.8 g | |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 6.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS FRIED CHICKEN AND HAM TENDER WHITE CHICKEN PATTY AND HAM | MEAT LASAGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 11 MG | 90 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 183 MG | 154 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 441 MG | 385 MG |