BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET vs BEEF ORGANIC GRASS-FED RIBEYE STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET: 4
vs
BEEF ORGANIC GRASS-FED RIBEYE STEAK: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET | BEEF ORGANIC GRASS-FED RIBEYE STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 218 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 19.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 15.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET | BEEF ORGANIC GRASS-FED RIBEYE STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET | BEEF ORGANIC GRASS-FED RIBEYE STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 4 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 304 MG | 60 MG |