BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET vs ANGUS PHILLY BEEF STEAKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET: 4
vs
ANGUS PHILLY BEEF STEAKS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET | ANGUS PHILLY BEEF STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 186 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 12.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET | ANGUS PHILLY BEEF STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS BACON-WRAPPED PORK FILET | ANGUS PHILLY BEEF STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 304 MG | 257 MG |