BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING vs LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING: 0
vs
LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING: 4
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 16.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 317 MG | 1,300 MG |