BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING: 3
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 1
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 16.7 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUEBERRY BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 317 MG | 1,071 MG |