BLACK FOREST HAM vs KIRKWOOD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KIRKWOOD wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
BLACK FOREST HAM: 0
vs
KIRKWOOD: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACK FOREST HAM | KIRKWOOD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 107 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLACK FOREST HAM | KIRKWOOD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACK FOREST HAM | KIRKWOOD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 679 MG | 857 MG |