BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES vs HORMEL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HORMEL wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES: 3
vs
HORMEL: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES | HORMEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 77 cal | 105 cal | |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 6.5 g | |
| Carbs | 14.6 g | 13.4 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 2.8 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES | HORMEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES | HORMEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 146 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 323 MG | 429 MG |