BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE SOFT BAKED COOKIES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE SOFT BAKED COOKIES wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE SOFT BAKED COOKIES: 5
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE SOFT BAKED COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 474 cal | 396 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 4.2 g | |
| Carbs | 68.4 g | 58.3 g | |
| Fat | 18.4 g | 14.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 2.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE SOFT BAKED COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE SOFT BAKED COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 26 MG | 83 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 211 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 474 MG | 312 MG |